Magnitude Variance Compression Before Large Earthquakes: A Unified Three-Force State Index with Prospective Validation, Nucleation Zone Localization, and a Proposed Monitoring Protocol for Japan and Turkey

Read full text
Authors: Ramakrishna Pasupuleti
Cited by: 1
References: 21

Abstract

Abstract Whether measurable statistical changes in earthquake catalogs precede large earthquakes remains one of the most debated questions in seismology. This study introduces and validates a unified seismic state index, Ψ = C × Q × (1 + S), that combines three independently measurable quantities—magnitude variance compression (C), seismicity rate quiescence (Q), and magnitude distribution skewness anomaly (S)—into a single dimensionless number characterizing the pre-seismic state of a fault zone. The method is built on a simple observation: the rolling standard deviation of earthquake magnitudes, computed within local spatial windows of 10–300 km around future mainshock epicenters, decreases systematically by 6–22% in the 7–21 days before large earthquakes. This suppression strengthens monotonically as the measurement radius decreases toward the epicenter—a spatial gradient that is the hallmark of a localized physical process rather than a statistical artifact. At near-field distances (10–50 km), a distinctive two-phase temporal pattern emerges: compression at 7–21 days followed by a variance increase at 1–3 days, consistent with aseismic preparation followed by foreshock-cascade onset. Using the JMA unified hypocenter catalog (2000–2023, 178,577 events, 288 isolated M ≥ 6.0 mainshocks) as the primary dataset, USGS ComCat data for Japan (46,515 events, 2000–2026) for consistency verification, and USGS ComCat data for Turkey (7,238 events, 2000–2026) for cross-regime validation, this study demonstrates: (1) walk-forward prospective testing with frozen 2000–2009 training parameters achieves AUC = 0.761 on 71 test-period mainshocks; (2) the Ψ index achieves AUC = 1.000 in discriminating detected from non-detected pre-earthquake states across eight events in two tectonic regimes; (3) a complementary lock-to-load ratio R = (C × Q)/(1 + E) independently achieves AUC = 1.000; (4) blind tests on post-catalog earthquakes detect the 2024 Noto M7.6 (703 fatalities, 95% pre-event compression), the 2025 Aomori M7.6, the 2020 Elazig M6.7, and the 2011 Van M7.1; (5) fine-resolution spatial scanning identifies future nucleation zones within 200 km in 50% of retrospective tests, including the 2011 Tohoku M9.1 at 62 km accuracy 14 months in advance. A two-force physical model is proposed: Force 1 (compression) arises from stress homogenization as aseismic loading synchronizes nearby faults; Force 2 (energy accumulation) arises from continued tectonic loading on the locked fault, manifesting as rightward skewness in the magnitude distribution. Rupture occurs when Force 2 overwhelms Force 1. The S4→S1 post-event reset observed universally confirms the physical reality of the pre-event compression. The method does not predict individual earthquakes; it identifies regions where the seismic system is simultaneously compressed, quiet, and energy-loaded. Current assessment identifies Van (Turkey, Ψ = 0.718), Erzincan (Turkey, Ψ = 0.644), and the Kanto corridor (Japan, Ψ = 0.45–0.59) as the highest-Ψ regions globally.

Fields of Study & Subjects

earthquake and tectonic studies High-pressure geophysics and materials Seismology and Earthquake Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Research Square
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Publication date
27 May 2026
Document type
Preprint