Underestimation of the costs of owning and running a car

Read full text
Authors: Adam Shier, Shane Timmons, Pete Lunn
Cited by: 1
References: 35

Abstract

Car ownership and use appears less responsive to cost increases and income declines than might be expected, a pattern often attributed to habit formation and lifestyle adjustment. An additional explanation is that motorists may underestimate how much they spend on owning and running a car, but there is little empirical evidence testing this possibility. Using a representative sample of 801 motorists, we compare intuitive estimates of the annual motoring costs with detailed itemised expenditure across all major fixed (e.g., tax, insurance) and variable (e.g., fuel/charging, parking) costs. Costs are almost 50% higher than motorists think. Median intuitive costs were €2,000, while median itemised costs were €2,923, excluding purchase price and depreciation. Most motorists (over 70%) exhibit this underestimation bias, with similar rates across engine types and socio-demographic groups. These findings are consistent with recall failures and salience bias when motorists consider the costs of owning and running a car, with potential implications for the persistence of car ownership. Improving the visibility and aggregation of motoring costs may complement fiscal and infrastructural measures aimed at supporting sustainable modal shift.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Urban Transport and Accessibility Energy Environment and Transportation Policies Older Adults Driving Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Publication date
1 January 2026
Document type
Preprint