Digital files as property in the New Zealand Supreme Court: innovation or confusion?

Read full text
Authors: Kelvin Fatt Kin Low, David Llewelyn
Cited by: 2

Abstract

<span>In <i>Dixon v R.</i> [2015] NZSC 147, the New Zealand Supreme Court allowed an appeal from the New Zealand Court of Appeal quashing the conviction of Jonathan Dixon on a charge under s.249(1)(a) of the New Zealand Crimes Act 1961 with accessing a computer system and thereby dishonestly obtaining property. The "property" concerned was a digital recording of footage of a patron married to a member of the British royal family socialising intimately with another patron who was not his wife. The decision to do so is as problematic as it is curious since some of the reasoning of the court does not appear relevant to the particular charge and it is not obvious why it was necessary to resort to this particular charge since it appears that Dixon could have been convicted under a different, far less controversial, charge anyway.</span>

Fields of Study & Subjects

Law AI and Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law Copyright and Intellectual Property

Publication details

Journal / source
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
132
Issue
3
Pages
394
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Preprint