Evaluating the Role of Surgical Telementoring in the Acquisition of Surgical Skills in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Developing surgical skills among residents requires time and resources, often in conflict with the goals of efficiency and hospital economics in surgical practice. Optimizing resident training may prevent a decline in quality. Skilled surgeons are vital to effective and safe surgical performance, yet the training trajectory for surgical residents is often inefficient, particularly in the era of minimally invasive surgery. A framework that efficiently disseminates surgical skills is essential to cultivate skilled future surgeons within an acceptable time frame. Surgical telementoring (ST) aligns well with minimally invasive surgery because the mentee operating in the field shares the telementor's perspective. Despite growing experience with telemedicine, data on educational outcomes remain limited. Objective: We aim to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT). Data collection will inform a future full-scale RCT evaluating whether real-time ST, combined with structured postoperative coaching, is superior to traditional on-site mentoring in developing laparoscopic cholecystectomy skills among surgical residents. Methods: Eligible residents will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group (real-time ST and postoperative coaching) or the control group (traditional intraoperative hands-on teaching). This research adheres to the extended SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statements for pilot RCTs and follows the intention-to-treat principle. Residents in both groups will perform 5 consecutive procedures under standardized intraoperative conditions. The primary outcomes are the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) score and the Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS). We hypothesize that the intervention group will show a 3- to 5-point improvement in the GOALS score compared with the control group. To achieve 0.8 statistical power, a P value