How to Evaluate the Accuracy of Symptom Checkers and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems: Symptom Checker Accuracy Reporting Framework (SCARF)

Read full text
Authors: Marvin Kopka, Markus A. Feufel
Cited by: 1
References: 27

Abstract

Unlabelled: Symptom checkers are apps and websites that assist medical laypeople in diagnosing their symptoms and determining which course of action to take. When evaluating these tools, previous studies primarily used an approach introduced a decade ago that lacked any type of quality control. Numerous studies have criticized this approach, and several empirical studies have sought to improve specific aspects of evaluations. However, even after a decade, a high-quality methodological framework for standardizing the evaluation of symptom checkers is still lacking. This paper synthesizes empirical studies to outline the Symptom Checker Accuracy Reporting Framework (SCARF) and a corresponding checklist for standardizing evaluations based on representative case selection, an externally and internally valid evaluation design, and metrics that increase cross-study comparability. This approach is supported by several open access resources to facilitate implementation. Ultimately, it should enhance the quality and comparability of future evaluations of online and artificial intelligence (AI)-based symptom checkers, diagnostic decision support systems, and large language models to enable meta-analyses and help stakeholders make more informed decisions.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Digital Mental Health Interventions Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Publication details

Journal / source
JMIR Human Factors
Publisher
JMIR Publications Inc.
Volume
13
Pages
e76168–e76168
Publication date
16 January 2026
Language
EN