Comparing the Quality of Patient Recovery After Open Appendectomy Under General Versus Spinal Anesthesia: Prospective Cohort Study

Read full text
Authors: Negesse Zurbachew Gobezie, Temesgen Birlie Asmare, Kumlachew Geta Belete, Gezahagn Demsu Gedefaw, Biruk Demissie, Abere Gebru Abuhay, Belayneh Jejaw Abate, Birhanu Mengist Munie, Wubet Tazeb Wondie, Habtie Bantider Wubet
Cited by: 1
References: 35

Abstract

Background: Open appendectomy is commonly performed under either general or spinal anesthesia. Postoperative quality of recovery, a multidimensional patient-centered measure of outcomes after surgery, is affected by the choice of anesthesia technique. Objective: The objective of our study was to compare the effects of general and spinal anesthesia on the immediate postoperative quality of recovery in adults undergoing open appendectomy. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 74 patients were assigned to either the general (n=37) or the spinal anesthesia (n=37) groups. The primary outcome was the total Quality of Recovery-15 score measured 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, analgesic consumption, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to first oral intake, time to first ambulation, and length of hospital stay. Intergroup comparisons were performed using the chi-square test, Fisher exact test, independent t test, or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Results: Patients in the spinal anesthesia group had significantly higher Quality of Recovery-15 scores than those in the general anesthesia group (P=.001). They also exhibited lower pain scores at 1, 2, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively (P

Fields of Study & Subjects

Nausea and vomiting management Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Anesthesia and Pain Management

Publication details

Journal / source
JMIR Perioperative Medicine
Publisher
JMIR Publications Inc.
Volume
9
Pages
e86273–e86273
Publication date
25 June 2026
Language
EN