Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Scores from Free Text: A Proof-of-Concept Study with the EuroQol-5D-3L and Transformer Models (Preprint)

Read full text
Authors: Arivazhagan Karunakaran, Mehul Motani, Evangelos Kontopantelis, José M Valderas
Cited by: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) have become an important tool in measuring a patient’s health status from their own perspective; however, they are typically measured using standardized questionnaires which do not account for each patient's unique experience of health. Recent improvements in Natural Language Processing (NLP) provide new possibilities to extract PROM scores from unstructured or free-text patient narratives; however, the feasibility and minimal data requirements needed to accomplish this task remain uncertain. OBJECTIVE To assess the practicality of transformer-based models for predicting EuroQol EQ-5D-3L scores from patient narratives and to evaluate minimum data requirements, narrative length and data augmentation effects. METHODS This proof-of-concept study used synthetically generated patient narratives to evaluate methodological feasibility. Three transformer models (BERT, BioBERT, DistilBERT) were fine-tuned for regression from patient narratives representing all 243 EQ-5D-3L health states. The performance of the models in various scenarios including a range of sample sizes (n=100–850), narrative length (100–1000 words), and data augmentation conditions were compared. The performance of the models was assessed through fivefold cross-validation and additional validation on datasets created by ChatGPT and DeepSeek. RESULTS Each model was able to predict EQ-5D-3L scores using each of the different configurations of data (n=100-850 patients; 100-1000-word narratives). However, optimal results were obtained when training the models with 100-word narratives derived from the largest number of people (n=850), where mean squared error=0.03 (95% CI: 0.02-0.04), mean absolute error=0.13 (95% CI: 0.13-0.15), explained variance=0.77 (95% CI: 0.64-0.77), and intraclass correlation coefficient=0.85 (95% CI: 0.81-0.87). Furthermore, it was found that the shorter narratives (100 words) performed better than longer narratives (100-1000 words). Additionally, the use of data augmentation improved the predictive performance. CONCLUSIONS Transformer models show promise in predicting EQ-5D-3L PROM scores from synthetic patient generated narratives, with a minimum of 250 patients providing around 100-word narratives required for reliable performance. The work provides both a methodological basis and empirical standards for AI-based PROM systems. However, clinical implementation will require validation using real patient-authored narratives prior to adoption. If validated, the use of this approach could provide evidence to support the inclusion of a patient's experience as a narrative into standardized outcome measures and support patient-centred healthcare evaluations.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Machine Learning in Healthcare Health Systems Economic Evaluations Quality of Life Topic Modeling

Publication details

Publication date
26 February 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Preprint