Predicting Depression Risk in University Students Using Transparent Machine Learning (Preprint)

Read full text
Authors: Ashly Ann Jo
Cited by: 0
References: 33

Abstract

UNSTRUCTURED Depressive symptoms among university students in India are increasing, yet routine screening using standardized clinical instruments remains limited in large educational systems. This work developed an interpretable machine-learning frame- work to estimate depressive symptom burden using a theory- driven proxy index derived from secondary psychosocial and contextual data. A cross-sectional secondary analysis was con- ducted using an anonymized student-level dataset (N = 27,901) and aggregated regional mental-health indicators across 231 administrative entities. Psychosocial variables representing sleep disruption, academic pressure, financial stress, social support, and related domains were combined into a proxy depressive- symptom burden index with acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.78). Four classifiers (logistic regression, ran- dom forest, support vector machine with radial basis kernel, and gradient boosting) were evaluated using cross-validated and held- out test performance, calibration, and decision-curve analysis. Suicidal ideation was included only in sensitivity analyses to avoid target leakage. Gradient boosting demonstrated the strongest discrimination (test AUC=0.88, 95% CI 0.87–0.89) with good calibration and positive net benefit across threshold probabilities of 0.20–0.70. In the leakage-controlled model, academic pressure, sleep disruption, financial stress, and reduced social support were the most influential predictors, while regional anxiety prevalence and substance-use burden provided additional contextual signals. Risk stratification classified 16% of students as low, 46% as moderate, and 38% as high burden. Interpretable, theory-aligned machine learning can estimate depressive symptom burden from secondary data and may support resource prioritization in settings where standardized screening is not routinely available; such models should function as human-in-the-loop decision- support tools rather than diagnostic systems, with prospective validation and fairness evaluation required before deployment.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Mental Health Treatment and Access Student Stress and Coping

Publication details

Publication date
27 February 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Preprint