Constitutional dialogue between the supreme courts and the legislative authority: A study of the mechanisms of interpretation and consensus to overcome crises of legislative vacuum

Read full text
Authors: Ahmed Sahib Abdul Jawad, Hussam Hatif Muslim, Haider Juma Mongi Nasrawi
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Research Summary: The findings from this research reveal how communication between the Supreme Court of LaPorte County and the State Legislature are important mechanisms to combat legislative vacuums caused by the inability to produce new laws. The role of the Supreme Court is not solely to evaluate the constitutionality of statutes; the court is also an active participant in the legislative process. The court serves as an additional check on the powers of all three branches of government; however, its most important role is its ability to mediate between conflicting legislative bodies.This discussion centers on the Court's ability to interpret the constitution whereby it raises what was meant by

Fields of Study & Subjects

Judicial and Constitutional Studies Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies American Constitutional Law and Politics

Publication details

Journal / source
International Journal of Criminal Common and Statutory Law
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
12–26
Publication date
1 January 2026