Comparison between free flap and local flap in post-oncological nasal reconstruction

Read full text
Authors: EDUARDO LUCAS VICENTINI PEREIRA, Luana Porcelli de Camargo Franco, NABILA BASSAM ELIAS, Ana Maria Tenório de Albuquerque Oubinha, Julia Valelongo Cerezine, Izadora Lunardi Bacovic, Roberta Criscione de Almeida Salles, Kaiky Takahama Nepomuceno, Fernanda Fernandes Toscani, Marco Fábio Spinelli Filho, Luiza Gatti Ferreira
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Post-oncological nasal reconstruction is one of the greatest challenges in facial reconstructive surgery, due to the anatomical complexity of the nose, its essential respiratory function, and its central role in facial identity.Among the available strategies, local flaps and free flaps represent fundamental approaches, with distinct indications and complementary results.This article provides a detailed comparison between local flaps and free flaps in nasal reconstruction after oncological resections, exploring anatomical principles, reconstructive planning, surgical techniques, aesthetic and functional results, complication rates, donor site morbidity, psychosocial impact, and clinical decision algorithms.The analysis shows that local flaps remain the basis of nasal reconstruction for small and moderate defects, while free flaps are indispensable in extensive defects, full-thickness defects, and irradiated or previously operated fields.The appropriate choice of technique, based on classic reconstructive principles and patient individualization, is crucial for lasting and satisfactory results.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies Cleft Lip and Palate Research

Publication details

Journal / source
International Journal of Health Science
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
1–6
Publication date
5 January 2026