1741-P: Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin (TI) vs. Rapid-Acting Analog in Youth with HbA1c ≤9.5%: Subgroup Analysis from INHALE-1

View at publisher
Authors: Kevin Kaiserman, Joseph Sylvan, Leah E. Mycue, JOANNE K. RINKER, Jennifer Nguyen, JENNIFER T. RITTENBERRY
Cited by: 1

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: Technosphere Insulin (TI) is an inhaled, ultra-rapid, prandial insulin. The INHALE-1 study enrolled youth with type 1 or type 2 diabetes with baseline HbA1c 7.0 to 11.0%. This analysis focuses on participants with baseline HbA1c ≤9.5%, a threshold commonly used in pediatric prandial insulin trials, which may reduce confounding from severe dysglycemia, barriers to medication taking, and insulin resistance, and to better isolate prandial insulin effects on glycemic endpoints. Methods: Participants aged 4-17 were randomized to TI plus basal insulin or rapid-acting insulin analog (RAA) plus basal insulin for 26 weeks. Change in baseline HbA1c to Week 26 was assessed using ANCOVA, with a non-inferiority margin of 0.4% for the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI). Safety and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics were also compared. Results: Participants with baseline HbA1c ≤9.5% (N=209; TI: 106, RAA: 103) were included. At Week 26, least squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c was 0.19% (95% CI: 0.007, 0.365) for TI and 0.08% (95% CI: -0.103, 0.256) for RAA. The LS mean difference (TI-RAA) was 0.11% (95% CI: -0.145, 0.364), meeting non-inferiority (CI upper limit

Fields of Study & Subjects

Diabetes Management and Research Diabetes and associated disorders Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery

Publication details

Journal / source
Diabetes
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Volume
75
Issue
Supplement_1
Publication date
5 June 2026
Language
EN