Geometrical comparison of a dedicated flaring bridging stent compared with an all-rounder product in fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair

Read full text
Authors: Natasha Hasemaki, Jan Stana, Konstantinos STAVROULAKIS, Konstantinos Maltezos, David Khangholi, Yassine Haddad, Nikolaos KONSTANTINOU, Nikolaos TSILIMPARIS
Cited by: 1
References: 26

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare early target vessel (TV) outcomes, procedural efficiency, and postoperative geometrical configuration of a dedicated flaring bridging stent graft with an established balloon-expandable covered stent graft in patients undergoing FEVAR or F/BEVAR. METHODS: This retrospective comparative cohort study included consecutive patients with FEVAR or F/BEVAR between September 2018 and February 2026. TVs treated with BeFlared were compared with TVs treated with BeGraft Peripheral. Primary endpoints were technical success and geometrical layout analysis. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 225 patients and 831 TVs, including 159 treated with BeFlared and 672 treated with BeGraft Peripheral. Target-vessel distribution was comparable between groups. Technical success was 99.4% for BeFlared and 97.9% for BeGraft Peripheral (P=0.33). Thirty-day TVI occurred in 0.6% versus 2.1%, respectively (P=0.33). BeFlared was associated with shorter bridging stenting time (5.1 [4.3-6.2] vs. 7.5 [4.9-9.6] minutes; P

Fields of Study & Subjects

Aortic aneurysm repair treatments Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions

Publication details

Journal / source
The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
Publisher
Edizioni Minerva Medica
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
444–454
Publication date
1 July 2026
Language
EN