A brief, clinically feasible alternative to evaluate response to exercise following sport-related concussion: initial validation of the 10-M in male healthy controls

View at publisher
Authors: Aaron M. Sinnott, Michael Paddack, George RUDDY, Blake CARLTON, Victoria Kochick, Shawn R. Eagle, Michael W. Collins, Jason P. Mihalik, Sarah Ostop, Christopher Connaboy, Anthony P. Kontos
Cited by: 0
References: 10

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare physiological responses, concussion symptoms, and rating of perceived exertion between the 10-M and treadmill protocols for the aerobic component of the dynamic exertion test (EXiT). We hypothesized that these outcomes would be similar between protocols and have moderate-to-strong agreement. METHODS: We conducted a within subject, cross-over study design comprised of fourteen healthy and physically active male adults. Participants performed the treadmill and the 10-M protocols in a randomized order separated by a 30-minute rest period. Pre- and postexercise resting heart rate (HR), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) were measured. Symptoms (headache, dizziness, and nausea), and RPE were recorded. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were conducted for HR and BP, and Cronbach's alpha for symptoms and RPE. RESULTS: There was moderate agreement for HR across minutes 6-12 (ICC>0.723, P

Fields of Study & Subjects

Traumatic Brain Injury Research Sports injuries and prevention Physical Activity and Health

Publication details

Journal / source
The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness
Volume
66
Issue
6
Pages
751–754
Publication date
9 March 2026
Language
EN