External validation and comparison of nomograms for prediction of long-term disease recurrence and survival for bladder cancer patients who undergo radical cystectomy

View at publisher
Authors: Rodrigue Benijts, Murat Akand, Mustafa Tıpırdamaz, Jonas Mennes, Loïc Baekelandt, Wouter Everaerts, Maarten Albersen, H. Van Poppel, Steven Joniau, Frank Van der Aa
Cited by: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare existing nomograms and identify which models best predict long-term survival outcomes, namely disease-free survival (DFS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS), in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BC). METHODS: Six nomograms (three for DFS, three for CSS) were selected from 20 studies and evaluated using data from 730 RC patients treated at University Hospitals Leuven. Discriminatory performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, along with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. Calibration was analyzed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test and calibration plots, while clinical utility was assessed through decision curve analysis (DCA). Statistical significance was set at P

Fields of Study & Subjects

Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Volume
78
Issue
4
Pages
560–573
Publication date
27 February 2026
Language
EN