Comparison of Ho:YAG and pTm:YAG lasers in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: safety, efficiency, and efficacy for lithotripsy

View at publisher
Authors: Ahmet F. OZSOY, Abdulrahman JAFAROV, Mehmet E. MARAS, Yusuf H. Şahin, Atakan Atakli, Vineet GAUHAR, Mehmet I. GOKCE
Cited by: 1
References: 28

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While several in-vitro studies have compared the performance of Holmium:YAG and pulsed Thulium:YAG lasers, no studies to date have directly compared the performance of these lasers during mini- PCNL. Herein, we aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and stone-free rates of Ho:YAG and pThulium:YAG lasers in patients undergoing mini-PCNL.METHODS: This prospective, non-randomized study included 264 patients who underwent mini-PCNL: 170 patients in the Ho:YAG group and 94 patients in the pTm:YAG group. Demographic characteristics, stone-related variables, and intraoperative and postoperative parameters were systematically recorded.RESULTS: Demographic characteristics and stone-related variables, including stone diameter, volume (mm3), and Hounsfield units, were similar between the groups; a significant difference was observed only in the GUYS score (P=0.013). Median total energy and energy consumption were significantly lower in the Ho:YAG group than in the pTm:YAG group (3954 J [1932-8630] vs. 9887 J [3961.25-21,972.75], and 1.52 J/mm3 [0.80-3.17] vs 5.03 J/mm3 [1.94-9.08], respectively; both P

Fields of Study & Subjects

Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments

Publication details

Journal / source
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Publisher
Edizioni Minerva Medica
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
400–410
Publication date
1 July 2026
Language
EN