Effectiveness of minimal stimulation versus conventional GnRH antagonist protocols in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a retrospective analysis of 10769 IVF/ICSI cycles

View at publisher
Authors: Shashank Sanagoudar, Vipin Chandra, Kshitiz Murdia, Nitiz Murdia, Shipra Nigam, Ritu Punhani, Gaurav SHARMA, Nihar BHOI, Walmik Mistari, Isha Suwalka
Cited by: 1
References: 21

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to find the efficacy of minimal stimulation protocol over antagonist protocol in infertile couples. METHODS: A total of 10769 patients who visited between January 2018 and January 2022 were included in this retrospective study. To reduce potential bias and baseline heterogeneity between the two groups, Propensity Score Matching was employed, so the data after propensity matching was N.=978. Group 1 - minimal stimulation group (N.=347) - received clomiphene citrate 100 mg along with gonadotropin (≤150 IU), either recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH) or human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG). Group 2, the conventional dose antagonist group (N.=631), received a conventional dosage of r-FSH (≥225 IU) as per institutional practice. RESULTS: The minimal stimulation group had a considerably higher live birth rate (58.20%) than the antagonist group (51.20%), with a P value of 0.035, demonstrating a statistically significant benefit for the minimal stimulation procedure. For live birth rate, endometrial thickness (odds ratio [OR] = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-1.36, P

Fields of Study & Subjects

Ovarian function and disorders Reproductive Health and Technologies Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Publication details

Journal / source
Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Edizioni Minerva Medica
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
215–224
Publication date
16 February 2026
Language
EN