Assessing Conformation Validity and Rationality of Deep Learning-Generated 3D Molecules

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have revolutionized the field of 3D molecule generation. However, the lack of effective evaluation methods for 3D conformations limits further improvements. Current techniques, in order to achieve the necessary speed for evaluating large number of AI-generated molecules, often rely on empirical geometric metrics that do not adequately capture various conformational anomalies, or on molecular mechanics (MM) energy metrics that exhibit low accuracy and lack atomic or torsional details. To address this gap, we propose a two-stage approach that achieves both high speed and quantum mechanical (QM) level accuracy. The first stage, termed the validity test, employs an AI-derived force field to identify atoms with elevated energy resulting from implausible neighboring environments. The tool developed for this purpose is named HEAD (high-energy atom detector). The second stage, known as the rationality test, utilizes a deep learning network trained on data with density functional theory (DFT) accuracy to detect rotatable bonds with high torsional energies. The tool developed for this purpose is named TED (torsional energy descriptor).