Emotive Aspects of Quotation in Diplomatic Discourse: A Study of US and UK Speeches in the UN Security Council (1964–1965)

The article explores the emotional aspects of quoting in diplomatic discourse within the framework of public political communication. The aim is to identify how different citation strategies contribute to the expression of emotivity in diplomats’ speeches. The study is based on 100 speeches delivered by the permanent representatives of the USA and the UK in the UN Security Council (1964–1965). Emotional polarity was assessed using automated tools: SentiWordNet, which assigns numerical values to words for their positive, neutral, or negative tone; VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner), which considers contextual associations; and WordCounter, which analyzes the frequency of key lexical items. Discourse and quantitative analysis were applied to determine the frequency and function of various citation types. The findings show that direct quotation prevails, aligning with institutional requirements for evidentiality. However, significant differences in citation strategies were observed: British diplomats more often use indirect quotation, integrating others’ speech into their arguments, while American representatives favor scare quotation – using quotation marks to signal distancing, irony, or doubt. Quotations were found to serve not only referential but also emotional functions, especially in contrastive contexts as tools of opposition. This is the first study to apply automated sentiment analysis to the emotional aspects of quoting in diplomatic discourse. It reveals differences in citation strategies that reflect national rhetorical styles. Special attention is given to the pragmatic functions of citation, interpreted via H.P. Grice’s Cooperative Principle. The study shows how adherence to or marked violation of Gricean maxims is strategically used to strengthen rhetorical positions and shape evaluative framing. A methodology for integrating sentiment analysis tools into the study of quotation was developed, and a corpus-based analysis conducted, enabling the identification of key pragmatic functions in institutional discourse.