Flow Focusing and Flow-Blurring: The In-Between Regime

View at publisher
Authors: Wayne S. Strasser, Nathaniel Morgan
Cited by: 1
References: 50

Abstract

The so-called two-fluid “flow-blurring” atomizer induces strong interphase constructive interference in a premixing region upstream of the atomizer orifice, resulting in efficient atomization of viscous fuels. Its less energetic counterpart, the “flow-focusing” atomizer, exists with different geometries and/or flow conditions. For a fixed geometry, lower gas flow rates and/or higher biofuel flow rates cause flow-blurring behavior to revert to flow-focusing. In doing so, the premixing region disappears, and atomization quality suffers. With the use of a previously validated volume-of-fluid-to-discrete-phase modeling methodology, a new flow regime is discovered, which lies between flow-focusing and flow-blurring. This intermediate “flow-undulating-mixing-swirling” regime replaces the multiphase premixing region with an oscillating biofuel–gas meniscus driven by concentric radial waves resulting from instabilities at the gas injection annulus. Bubbles form within this oscillating meniscus and remain trapped in the biofuel jet, but there is no orifice exit shattering that is typically associated with flow-blurring. Mixing across lateral axes and swirling are also exhibited in the biofuel jet due to secondary azimuthal and axial waves. While frequencies in the 1000 Hz range characterize primary radial wave formation, a wide range of timescales evolve as a function of distance from the bubbling/meandering meniscus.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer Combustion and flame dynamics Fluid Dynamics and Mixing

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Propulsion and Power
Publisher
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
600–614
Publication date
22 February 2026
Language
EN