Ischemic stroke versus hemorrhagic stroke – A comparative study on the outcome of stroke survivors attending a comprehensive stroke center of a tertiary care hospital

Read full text
Authors: Albin Varghese, Thomas Iype, Abhiram Krishna, Amrutha Vijayan, Saraswati Vivek, Ajeesh Raj Susamma Rajan
Cited by: 1
References: 19

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of this study was to compare the long-term effects of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and hemorrhagic stroke (HS) using the stroke impact assessment questionnaire (SIAQ), which is beneficial in assessing stroke outcomes in a culturally appropriate manner. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study, conducted among stroke survivors attending a comprehensive stroke center for review, was the data source. Sociodemographic factors, including clinical data, were collected, and SIAQ and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were used for evaluating disability. Results: Out of 130 subjects, 112 had AIS and 18 had HS. Initial disability was higher among HS patients ( P = 0.048). However, mRS scores were similar at follow-up in both groups ( P = 0.640). SIAQ scores did not significantly differ between AIS and HS patients ( P = 0.177) across its eight domains. A correlation was observed between the SIAQ motor domain and mRS score at follow-up ( r = 0.845, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Outcomes, as measured by mRS and SIAQ, do not differ between AIS and HS patients. The motor domain of SIAQ correlated with mRS scores.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Acute Ischemic Stroke Management Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice
Publisher
Scientific Scholar
Volume
17
Pages
81–86
Publication date
28 January 2026
Language
EN