Quality assessment evaluation.

Read full text
Authors: Gloria Sukali, Motswedi Anderson, Khadija Said Mohammed, Patricia Biggs, Marion Delphin, Joanna Redmond, Tongai Gibson Maponga, Katya Govender, Seth Kwabena Amponsah, Jan-Willem Alffenaar, Catriona Waitt, Collins C. Iwuji
+1 more Philippa Clare Matthews
Cited by: 0

Abstract

This table summarizes data collated for quality assessment for a systematic review. We assessed data quality and risk of bias using approved tools from the Joanna Briggs Institute. We downloaded a standard data collection proforma, and populated this alongside data extraction to include: were criteria for inclusion of samples to be clearly defined? Were subjects and settings described in detail? Was exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? Were objective, standard criteria used for the measurement of the condition? Were confounding identified and what strategies were put in place to deal with confounders? Were outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? and lastly was the appropriate statistical tool used?

Fields of Study & Subjects

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Epidemiology Methodologies in Health Research and Practice

Publication details

Journal / source
The Francis Crick Institute
Publication date
27 January 2026
Document type
Dataset