Evaluation of cervical pain interventions: Systematic review and meta-analysis of physical therapy, exercise, and medications

Read full text
Authors: Abdulsalam Mohammed Aleid, Nouf Abdullah Alyabis, Saud Nayef Aldanyowi, Mutlaq Naheitan Alsubaie, Lama Ibrahim Aloraini, Abdulrahman Rashed Almoslem, Loai Saleh Albinsaad, Hasan Ali Abdullah Alaidarous, Zainab Mohammed Aleid, Abbas Saleh Al Mutair
Cited by: 0
References: 34

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical discomfort, or neck pain, is a significant global health issue and a leading cause of disability. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the effectiveness of non-surgical interventions, including physiotherapy, exercise, manual therapy, and muscle energy techniques, in reducing pain and improving function. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus up to September 2024 identified 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 3,286 participants. Studies comparing these interventions to placebo or other treatments were included. Exclusions applied to cases involving cancer, infections, fractures, radiculopathy, prior cervical surgery, or high-risk bias studies. Results: All interventions significantly reduced pain and improved function. Manual therapy was superior to physical therapy for pain relief (SMD -0.30), while exercise outperformed usual care for pain (SMD -0.68) and function (SMD -0.49). NSAIDs showed moderate pain relief (SMD -0.31). Conclusion: Non-surgical interventions effectively treat cervical pain, but further research is necessary to optimize strategies.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment

Publication details

Journal / source
Electronic Journal of General Medicine
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
em715–em715
Publication date
15 February 2026
Language
EN