Validation of a Deep-Learning Coregistration Framework for Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT Using Low-Radiation-Exposure Protocols Across Various Tracers

Read full text
Authors: Z. Li, Laura Providência, Philipp Mohr, Samaneh Mostafapour, Mostafa Roya, Tonantzin Samara Martínez-Lucio, Joost F. Somsen, Goudje L van Leeuwen, Giordana Salvi de Souza, Joyce van Sluis, Andor W.J.M. Glaudemans, Rudi Dierckx
+9 more J.P.P.M. de Vries, Gert Luurtsema, Riemer H. J. A. Slart, Adrienne H. Brouwers, Paul Schleyer, Maurizio Conti, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Joshua D. Schaefferkoetter, Charalampos Tsoumpas
Cited by: 0
References: 29

Abstract

The advent of long–axial-field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT systems has significantly improved whole-body imaging by providing higher sensitivity and extended torso coverage. However, PET/CT potential misalignment remains a challenge, potentially introducing artifacts and quantification errors. Moreover, PET protocols with reduced scanning duration and dose, as well as the use of ultra-low-dose CT (ULD-CT), are increasingly relevant in clinical practice and research. This study aimed to evaluate the robustness and generalizability of a deep-learning coregistration framework for PET/CT alignment using low-dose PET and ULD-CT across various tracers with a LAFOV system. Methods: In total, 63 scans with 4 different tracers (89Zr-trastuzumab, 15O-H2O, 18F-MC225, and 18F-FDG) were included to assess PET and CT alignment improvements. Further evaluation was performed by comparing CT scans coregistered to the original PET images (rCT) with those coregistered to low-count (50%, 25%, and 12.5% of original counts) PET images (LC-rCT). Dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distance, and average surface distance were used as evaluation metrics. Furthermore, ULD-CT coregistered to PET (rULD-CT) was compared with low-dose CT coregistered to the same PET (rLD-CT) using the same metrics. PET accuracy was evaluated by calculating SUVs. Results: The robustness of the deep-learning coregistration framework was demonstrated in reduced PET counts and ULD-CT scenarios across tracers. All metrics indicated robust performance when comparing LC-rCT with rCT and rULD-CT with rLD-CT. Consistent SUVs across varying PET counts and ULD-CT conditions further validated the quantitative accuracy of the approach. Conclusion: This work highlights that neither the use of low-dose PET protocols nor ULD-CT compromise the performance of this coregistration framework across 4 tracers. For LAFOV PET, these findings support the feasibility of such a framework in imaging protocols with reduced radiation exposure.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications Medical Image Segmentation Techniques Radiation Dose and Imaging

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Volume
67
Issue
5
Pages
810–816
Publication date
5 February 2026
Language
EN