Enhancing reporting standards and cumulative evidence in ventriculoperitoneal shunt studies: a systematic review and reporting guideline proposal

View at publisher
Authors: Luísa Cardoso, Marcio Yuri Ferreira, Lucas Pari Mitre, Leonardo B. O. Brenner, Anthony E. Bishay, Silvio Porto, Gabriel Scarpioni Barbosa, João Paulo Liute Scamarral, Gabriel da Silva Semione, Luis Fabrini Paleare, Túlio F. S. Leite, Raphael Bertani
+3 more Christian Ferreira, David Langer, Netanel Ben-Shalom
Cited by: 1
References: 148

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement remains the primary treatment for hydrocephalus. However, the literature on this topic is heterogeneous, with studies assessing and reporting surgical and clinical outcomes in different ways, lacking standardization. The authors aimed to evaluate the quality of these studies and propose a reporting guideline focusing on essential elements to ensure reproducibility and comparability. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. Eligible studies were observational or randomized, reported clinical and/or surgical outcomes related to the treatment of hydrocephalus with VPS placement, included more than 200 patients, and were published in the English language between January 1, 2000, and June 1, 2024. Studies were assessed and focused on 6 key domains: 1) baseline characteristics of the patient sample; 2) study methodology and reporting guidelines; 3) patient comorbidities and clinical status; 4) valve and shunt characteristics; 5) shunt failure, revision, and infection; and 6) postsurgical outcomes and complications. RESULTS: Forty-five studies comprising 95,597 patients were included. The authors' assessment revealed substantial gaps in the literature on VPS placement, including deficiencies across all domains. A VPS reporting guideline was developed, consisting of 50 items distributed across 6 domains, focusing on key surgical and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified important gaps in methodological rigor and reporting across VPS studies for hydrocephalus, limiting the comparability and reproducibility of current evidence. To address these issues, the authors propose the VPS Reporting Guideline, a practical framework to enhance transparency, reproducibility, and comparability in future research, ultimately supporting better evidence synthesis and building of cumulative evidence.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of neurosurgery
Publisher
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
Volume
144
Issue
4
Pages
821–833
Publication date
22 January 2026
Language
EN