Spinal Metastasis Reporting: Evidence-Based Recommendation on Behalf of the American Society of Spine Radiology Education and Standards Committee

Read full text
Authors: Rami W. Eldaya, Saad Ali, Mohiuddin Hadi, Jacob W. Ormsby, Sandra Abi Fadel, Mai-Lan Ho
Cited by: 0
References: 68

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Structured reporting in radiology is universally endorsed by the radiology societies, including American Society of Neuroradiology/American Society of Spine Radiology (ASNR/ASSR). Structured reporting offers many advantages including standardization of reports and simplifying reports for referring providers and researchers to extract meaningful and important information. Furthermore, templates can guide radiologists by providing a checklist on necessary items to include in the report that can facilitate patient care and optimize patient management. METHODS: Despite the known benefits of structured reporting, structured reporting of spinal metastasis continues to be lacking. This is explained by many factors including complexity of spinal metastasis, variability of its appearance based on primaries, multiplicity of lesions/variable extent of disease, and technical differences among MRI acquisition protocols between institutions. KEY MESSAGE: In this white paper from the American Society of Spine Radiology Education and Standards Committee, we aim to provide a recommended structured reporting of spinal metastasis highlighting pertinent observations that are needed in reporting metastasis, reflecting relevance of radiology reporting to recent advances in treatment modalities, discussing advanced and emerging imaging modalities, and finally touching briefly on follow-up recommendations and challenges.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Management of metastatic bone disease Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications Radiology practices and education

Publication details

Journal / source
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume
47
Issue
8
Pages
2004–2014
Publication date
9 February 2026
Language
EN