The Sustainability-Adoption Paradox: Why High Adopting MSMEs Report More Barriers - Evidence from Zimbabwe
Abstract
The integration of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) into the sustainability agenda is crucial for sustainable development, yet remains poorly understood in resource-constrained contexts. This study explores the complex interplay between sustainable practice adoption and perceived barriers among MSMEs in Zimbabwe. Through a cross-sectional survey of 312 enterprises, we identified a distinct hierarchy in the adoption of sustainable development practices: solar energy leads significantly (62.18%), substantially outdoing waste recycling (41.67%), water conservation (42.31%), and sustainable packaging (40.06%). While financial constraints (high costs: 50.3%; limited financing: 48.1%) and knowledge gaps (technical: 40.4%; information: 38.5%) were prevalent, the most critical finding reveals a central paradox: a strong positive correlation (r ≈ 0.98) between adoption intensity and barriers reported. High adopters (averaging 5.47 practices) cited significantly more obstacles than low adopters (0.64 barriers), particularly in technical knowledge (76.7% vs. 9.5%) and limited finance (73.3% vs. 30.5%). This suggests that barrier recognition and navigation are essential to the adoption process, not simply deterrents. The study concludes that standard intervention models are inadequate. We recommend a multifaceted strategy: leveraging solar energy as a strategic entry point, shifting training from theory to practical implementation support, developing integrated financial products, and implementing tiered support systems tailored to different adoption stages. These findings provide a comprehensive framework for policymakers and practitioners to bridge the intention-action gap and accelerate sustainable development in emerging economies.
Fields of Study & Subjects
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Sustainability and Innovation in Business
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Publication details
- Journal / source
- Inproforum ...
- Volume
- 19
- Pages
- 18–25
- Publication date
- 31 January 2026