Venetoclax and azacitidine for younger acute myeloid leukemia patients independent of fitness for intensive chemotherapy

Read full text
Authors: Justin M. Watts, Ellen Madarang, Diana Abbott, Payton Hart, Connor Sohalski, Alessia Zoso, Jessie Dell-Martin, Ayele Belachew, Maria L. Amaya, Andrew Kent, Christine M. McMahon, Marc Schwartz
+16 more Mikkael A. Sekeres, C. Estelle Smith, Terrence Bradley, J. Richard Taylor, Namrata S. Chandhok, Sangeetha Venugopal, Craig Jordan, Mary Berg, Mary Haag, Nicholas Willard, Dara L. Aisner, Jeffrey Schowinsky, Zenggang Pan, Jinjing Zhang, Jonathan A. Gutman, Daniel A. Pollyea
Cited by: 3

Abstract

Venetoclax (ven) + azacitidine (aza) is the standard of care for newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy (IC). Because prognostic factors for ven/aza and IC differ, an AML patient fit for IC may derive more benefit from ven/aza. We therefore designed a trial for younger, newly-diagnosed AML patients with non-favorable-risk disease to receive ven/aza regardless of "fitness" for IC (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT03573024). We aimed to understand toxicity and efficacy in this population, and retrospectively compared outcomes to matched IC patients. Newly-diagnosed non-favorable-risk patients ≤60 years old were enrolled and received ven, dose escalated to 600 mg/daily x28 days, with aza 75 mg/m2 x7 days on a 28-day cycle. Subjects were encouraged to move expeditiously to allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) in first remission. Thirty-six subjects enrolled. Median age was 49 years (range, 22-59). Grade ≥3 neutropenia (42%), anemia (33%), thrombocytopenia (53%) and febrile neutropenia (36%) were common. The overall response rate (ORR) was 25 of 36 (69%) with 19 (53%) complete remissions; 68% of responders achieved MRD-negativity. Most subjects (53%) bridged to ASCT, and the majority of non-responders were successfully salvaged with IC. The median progression-free-survival and overall survival have not been reached (median follow-up 2.9 years). Compared to IC-matched controls, the ORR, ASCT rate and progression-free survival were significantly improved (69% vs. 44%; P=0.0495; 53% vs. 28%; P=0.0290; and not reached vs. 60.8 months; P=0.007). Hospital days, transfusions and infectious complications were significantly reduced for ven/aza subjects. Ven/aza is feasible for newly-diagnosed, younger, non-favorable-risk AML patients, and appears at least as effective as IC.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research Neutropenia and Cancer Infections Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Publication details

Journal / source
Haematologica
Publisher
Ferrata Storti Foundation (Haematologica)
Volume
111
Issue
9
Pages
2957–2965
Publication date
26 February 2026
Language
EN