Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Intravitreal 0.625% Povidone-Iodine versus Antibiotic Injection for Postoperative Endophthalmitis

PURPOSE: Postoperative endophthalmitis is a sight-threatening intraocular infection requiring prompt treatment. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of intravitreal 0.625% povidone-iodine (PI) injection with intravitreal antibiotic injection for the treatment of postoperative endophthalmitis. METHODS: A retrospective review of 40 eyes diagnosed with postoperative endophthalmitis was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 received intravitreal 0.625% PI injection (0.1 mL), while group 2 received intravitreal antibiotic injection. Clinical data, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, the number of intravitreal injections, duration of anterior chamber hypopyon, and the need for pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), were analyzed. RESULTS: Group 1 (24 eyes) showed significant improvements in BCVA posttreatment (mean, 1.04 ± 0.95 logMAR; p < 0.001) compared to group 2 (16 eyes; mean, 1.26 ± 0.99 logMAR; p = 0.092). Severe visual impairment (BCVA < 10 / 100) was significantly less frequent in group 1 (25.0%) than in group 2 (62.5%) (p = 0.025). The mean duration of hypopyon was shorter in group 1 (2.6 ± 2.2 days) compared to group 2 (6.4 ± 7.3 days, p = 0.048). Fewer intravitreal injections (p = 0.002) and PPV (p = 0.002) were required in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal 0.625% PI injection was associated with fewer intravitreal injections, shorter hypopyon duration, and more favorable visual outcome-related measures, including significant visual improvement from baseline and a lower frequency of severe visual impairment, compared with intravitreal antibiotic treatment. These findings suggest that PI may be considered a safe and effective initial treatment option for postoperative endophthalmitis. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results.