Analysis of 386 alternative medicinal products implicated in liver injury reveal clinically relevant associations with potentially hepatotoxic botanicals, pharmaceutical adulteration, heavy metal contamination, and undisclosed animal content

Read full text
Authors: Cyriac Abby Philips, Tharun Tom Oommen, Arif Hussain Theruvath, Aryalakshmi Sreemohan, A. Grace Baby, Rizwan Ahamed, Ajit Tharakan, Philip Augustine
Cited by: 2
References: 27

Abstract

Background: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)-related hepatotoxicity is a growing global concern. We utilized multi-modal analysis to characterize CAM product safety and identify predictors of severe liver injury. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 386 CAM products from 91 consecutive patients (mean 4.2 products/patient) presenting with CAM-related adverse events at a tertiary center in South India (2021-2023). Product-level analyses characterize the CAM supply chain while patient-level analyses inform clinical outcome associations. Investigations included ingredient documentation, heavy metal quantification, and GC-MS compound profiling. Results: The mean patient age was 48.2 years (75.8% male). ACLF occurred in 39.6% of all patients (36/91) and 41.9% of those with hepatic adverse events (36/86), with associated mortality of 38.9% (14/36) compared to 10.9% (6/55) in non-ACLF presentations (OR 5.20, P = 0.004). Heavy metals exceeded WHO limits in many products: mercury (34%), cadmium (25%), arsenic (21%), and lead (14%). Cadmium exposure exceeding WHO limits showed a strong association with ACLF (75.9% vs 22.6%, P

Fields of Study & Subjects

Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies Heavy Metals in Plants

Publication details

Journal / source
Frontiers in Gastroenterology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Volume
5
Pages
1784785–1784785
Publication date
11 March 2026
Language
EN