Impact of creatine supplementation on inflammation: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized double-blind placebo trials

Read full text
Authors: Kell Mazzini Ribeiro de Camargo, Alejandro Bruna-Mejías, Juan José Valenzuela-Fuenzalida, Luana Almeida [UNESP] Gonzaga, Sandra Maria Barbalho, Alexandre L. Barroca, Andrey Alves [UNIFESP] Porto, Rodrigo D. Raimundo, Luiz Carlos de Abreu, Vitor E. Valenti
Cited by: 3
References: 31

Abstract

Introduction Creatine supplementation is widely recognized for its ergogenic effects on strength and body composition. Recent studies have explored its potential anti-inflammatory properties, particularly in exercise-induced stress and aging-related chronic inflammation. However, results across randomized trials remain inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of creatine supplementation on inflammatory biomarkers in human populations. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251027784). Eight randomized controlled trials were included, evaluating creatine supplementation (various dosages and durations) versus placebo in healthy individuals, athletes, and clinical populations. The primary outcomes were inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-1β, TNF-α, and prostaglandin E 2 . Data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed by two independent reviewers. The certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE framework. Results Pooled analysis showed no significant acute effects of creatine on CRP (SMD = 0.32; 95% CI: -0.29 to 0.94; p = 0.30; I² = 28%). Chronic effects of creatine on CRP (SMD = -0.11; 95% CI: -0.69 to 0.48; p = 0.73; I² = 0%) and IL-6 (SMD = -0.06; 95% CI: -0.64 to 0.53; p = 0.84; I² = 0%) were also no significant. The certainty of evidence was rated as moderate for all outcomes. Risk of bias varied, with missing outcome data being the most frequent limitation. Conclusion Creatine supplementation does not significantly reduce inflammatory biomarkers in humans based on current evidence. Although certain benefits were observed under intense endurance conditions, results remain inconsistent across populations. Future well-powered trials with standardized protocols are needed to clarify creatine’s role in modulating inflammation. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , identifier CRD420251027784.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Muscle metabolism and nutrition Exercise and Physiological Responses Biochemical effects in animals

Publication details

Journal / source
Frontiers in Immunology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Volume
17
Pages
1743603–1743603
Publication date
19 February 2026
Language
EN