Cluster analysis and risk prediction model construction for antisynthase syndrome-associated interstitial lung disease based on clinical, imaging, and antibody characteristics

Read full text
Authors: Jin Zhang, Wenfeng Gao, Baoting Chao, Minghua Huang, Yuyu Yang, Ying Zhang, Rongzhen Xia, Yiting Lin, Kaining Gao, Wei Xu, Qingrui Yang
Cited by: 1
References: 39

Abstract

Objective Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common and serious complication of anti-synthase syndrome (ASS), exhibiting high heterogeneity. This study aimed to stratify patients with ASS-associated ILD (ASS-ILD) based on their clinical features, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings, and specific antibody profiles. We also aimed to build a predictive model for severe ASS-ILD to help identify it more accurately. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and laboratory data of 100 patients with ASS-ILD. Unsupervised clustering of clinical characteristics was done using multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to find independent risk factors for severe ASS-ILD, and a risk prediction model was built. Results We identified three patient groups: Cluster 1 ( n = 46), the joint-predominant group, featured joint pain as the primary clinical manifestation. HRCT typically showed a non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern, anti-Jo-1 antibodies were most common, and lung damage was relatively mild. Cluster 2 ( n = 41), the fever and Raynaud’s phenomenon group, had significantly higher anti-EJ antibody levels than the other groups. Cluster 3 ( n = 13), the severe lung group, had much higher Warrick scores than the others. This group also had a higher frequency of a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern on HRCT, more cases positive for anti-PL-7 or anti-PL-12 antibodies, more severe lung diffusion problems, and more heart involvement. We created and tested a combined biomarker index based on complement C3 level, rash, and age. This index demonstrated superior performance in distinguishing severe from non-severe ILD in ASS patients, independent of clinical variables such as gender, age, and smoking history. Conclusion Identifying ASS-ILD heterogeneity requires comprehensive consideration of HRCT features, antibody profiles, and clinical manifestations. The combined biomarker index (based on complement C3, rash, and age) offers an objective tool for ASS-ILD diagnosis and risk stratification.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis

Publication details

Journal / source
Frontiers in Medicine
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Volume
13
Pages
1798039–1798039
Publication date
1 April 2026
Language
EN