Conceptual proposal for LLM-generated FDG PET/CT follow-up reports in melanoma: a pilot study on model stability and blinded expert evaluation

Read full text
Authors: Wolfram A. Bosbach, Marie S. Heide, Nasir Gözlügöl, Dana Fatemeh, Foroud Aghapour Zangeneh, David Ventura, P Schindler, Wolfgang Roll, Franziska Strunz, Federico Caobelli, Kuangyu Shi, Ali Afshar-Oromieh
+2 more A R Rominger, Robert Seifert
Cited by: 2
References: 25

Abstract

Purpose Oncological patients regularly undergo PET/CT re-staging, which requires a report that outlines their current disease status and highlights relevant changes compared to the previous PET/CT. Large language models (LLMs) may be helpful with documentation in the future. This study is a pilot on LLM performance, focusing on test–retest stability and reproducibility. Methods Three textbook melanoma follow-up cases of increasing complexity (involving one to eight organs) were selected. From standardized text-only prompts (no imaging data), follow-up reports were written by GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4 (each producing three independent revisions), and three nuclear medicine residents. This yielded nine reports per case (27 in total). Six blinded nuclear medicine experts (three internal, three external) performed test–retest evaluations of report quality and authorship identification. Results The cosine similarity analysis revealed high intra-case coherence (mean: 0.599–0.727) regardless of authorship. The external human readers consistently rated reports higher than the internal human readers. The LLM-generated reports received comparable or superior ratings to human reports, with Claude achieving the highest external reader scores (mean 0.926, standard deviation 0.263, on a 0–1 scale). Human performance declined with case complexity, while Claude, in particular, improved. The external readers significantly preferred the LLM impressions (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.005). Neither the human nor LLM readers reliably identified authorship (balanced accuracy 0.343–0.500). Conclusion In this pilot, blinded expert evaluation demonstrated that current LLMs can generate reports for melanoma [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT of comparable quality to human-authored reports from text prompts in this study. High test–retest stability was obtained. Larger future studies will be required to confirm these findings.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Authorship Attribution and Profiling Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Publication details

Journal / source
Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Volume
6
Pages
1723650–1723650
Publication date
12 March 2026
Language
EN