Global consensus for the screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and surveillance of ovarian cancer in areas of significant resource limitations: report from the International Gynecological Cancer Society consensus meeting

Read full text
Authors: Fernando Cotait Maluf, Henrique Alkalay Helber, Francinne T. Tostes, Ligia A. Maluf, Juliana K. Helito, Renato Moretti‐Marques, Graziela Zibetti Dal Molin, Bruno Roberto Braga Azevedo, David Isla Ortiz, David Cantu, Agnaldo Lopes Silva Filho, Angélica Nogueira‐Rodrigues
+25 more Reitan Ribeiro, Georgia Cintra, Gustavo Guitmann, Andréia Cristina de Melo, Eduardo Paulino, Glauco Baiocchi, Leandro José Araújo Resende, Michelle Samora de Almeida, Diocésio Alves Pinto de Andrade, Julio Lau de la Vega, Florencia Noll, Fábio Roberto Fin, Andre Lopes, Miguel E. Correa, Joseph S. Ng, Daniel Sanabria, Gabriel Rendón P, Fernando Martínez Heredia, Ana Beatriz Barbosa Lopes, Myriam B. Mussi, Marcin Bobinski, Milagros Pérez-Quintanilla, Jimena Meymar, David M. Atallah, Audrey Tsunoda
Cited by: 0
References: 14

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this consensus report is to provide practical, resource-stratified recommendations for the management of ovarian cancer in countries with limited resources, where direct application of international guidelines is often difficult. To address these challenges, recommendations were developed from a panel of international experts. Methods: The panel met in New York in September/October 2022 during the International Gynecological Cancer Society congress and was composed of specialists from countries in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. The panel addressed 72 questions and provided recommendations for the diagnosis, staging, treatment, and surveillance of ovarian cancer. Consensus was defined as at least 75% of the voting members selecting a particular recommendation, whereas a majority vote was considered when one option garnered between 50% and 74.9% of votes. Resource limitation was defined as any issues limiting access to qualified surgeons, contemporary imaging or radiation-oncology techniques, antineoplastic drugs, or funding for providing modern medical care. Results: Consensus was reached for 10 out of 72 (13.9%) questions presented to the panel, whereas a majority vote was reached for 26 (36.1%) additional questions. For the remaining questions, there was considerable heterogeneity in the recommendations. Conclusion: The development of guidelines focusing on areas facing more severe resource limitations may improve medical practice and patient care.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments BRCA gene mutations in cancer

Publication details

Journal / source
Frontiers in Oncology
Volume
15
Pages
1677427–1677427
Publication date
12 January 2026
Language
EN