Construction and application of coordination ability evaluation tool for children aged 4–5.9 years old

Read full text
Authors: Weifu Chen, Na Li
Cited by: 0
References: 7

Abstract

Background: Coordination ability is a critical component influencing children's basic motor skills and participation in physical activities. Positive experiences formed during early movement practice are essential for lifelong health. Purpose: This study aimed to scientifically construct a systematic and user-friendly evaluation tool for assessing coordination ability in children aged 4.0-5.9 years, thereby enhancing understanding and promoting targeted development in family and kindergarten activities. Methods: The evaluation indicators were determined through literature review, structured expert interviews, expert interviews, and the Delphi method. Sixteen cities in Shandong Province were sampled using a stratified random cluster sampling approach. A total of 1,068 valid samples were obtained (530 children aged 4.0-4.9 years and 538 children aged 5.0-5.9 years). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 and AMOS 26.0, including exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to test model validity. Results: The structural model of coordination ability demonstrated good fit indices. Coordination ability was found to consist of six key dimensions: balance, spatial orientation, rhythm, perceptual judgment, limb coordination, and limb movement range. Evaluation criteria for both 4- and 5-year-old groups were established. Girls exhibited higher overall coordination scores than boys. Boys in the 4-year-old group showed superior perceptual and judgment ability, while boys in the 5-year-old group performed better in perceptual judgment and spatial orientation. Conclusion: (1) The constructed evaluation tool accurately reflects children's coordination development. (2) The established single and composite scoring criteria effectively distinguish coordination levels among children aged 4-5.9 years. (3) Gender differences exist, with girls generally outperforming boys, though developmental asynchrony is evident across coordination components.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Children's Physical and Motor Development Physical Education and Training Studies Child Development and Education

Publication details

Journal / source
Frontiers in Public Health
Volume
14
Pages
1698428–1698428
Publication date
11 February 2026
Language
EN