Correction: “Does one plus one exceed two?” The synergistic effect of Innovative City and Smart City pilots on work safety governance—evidence from a quasi-natural experiment

• Pick the most relevant text template(s) from the following page and delete all others.• Edit the text as necessary, ensuring that the original incorrect text is included for the record, please see the below.• Please do not use any extra formatting when editing the templates, and only modify the red text unless absolutely necessary• Submit to Frontiers following the instructions on this page.When the original text contained incorrect information, to preserve the scientific record, please include that text when editing the below templates. For example:There was a mistake in the Funding statement, an incorrect number was used. The correct number is "2015C03Bd051.". The publisher apologizes for this mistake.The original version of this article has been updated.In the published article, there was a mistake in the Funding statement. (in 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2018, and 2022), covering 97 prefecturelevel cities.Additionally, three batches of Smart City pilots were introduced in January 2013, August 2013, and April 2015, encompassing 104 prefecture level cities. Due to the differences in city lists and implementation timings, this study employs a staggered DID approach to estimate the impact of the dual-pilot policy on worksafety governance.]"The original version of this article has been updated.[In this paper, we use the proportion of secondary industry output value as a proxy variable for industrial upgradingthe lower this proportion, the higher the degree of industrial upgrading. Therefore, the impact of the policy on industrial upgrading is negative rather than positive.]. A correction has been made to the section [The first paragraph of "Industrial Upgrading Effect" in the mechanism analysis]:"[The dual-pilot policy promotes work safety governance through industrial upgrading. As shown in Table 6, column (3), the policy has a significant negative effect on industrial upgrading at the 1% significance level, demonstrating that policy-driven industrial transformation helps reduce the likelihood of accidents. By advancing smart manufacturing and automation, optimizing production processes and organizational structures, enhancing production efficiency, and minimizing manual operations, the policy provides systemic support across multiple dimensions, including safety concepts, institutional norms, and technical equipment, jointly driving improvements in work safety governance. Thus, Hypothesis H3 is supported.]"The original version of this article has been updated.