Socioeconomic inequity in extreme outcomes within very pre-term and/or very low birthweight infants: evidence from multi-national cohorts

Read full text
Authors: Hanifa Pilvar, Catia Nicodemo, Stavros Petrou, Brian A. Darlow, Paula van Dommelen, Kari Anne I. Evensen, Sarah Harris, L. John Horwood, Samantha J Johnson, Neil Marlow, Karen Mathewson, Saroj Saigal
+4 more Louis A. Schmidt, Dieter Wolke, Lianne J. Woodward, Sungwook Kim
Cited by: 1
References: 28

Abstract

Background Pre-term birth (< 37 weeks' gestation) is a major cause of neonatal mortality, with very pre-term (< 32 weeks' gestation) and extremely pre-term (< 28 weeks' gestation) infants facing the highest risks. While socioeconomic disparities in pre-term birth are well-documented, relatively little is known about inequities among the highest risk subgroups. Methods Using data from the RECAP Pre-term Project across six high-income countries, we analyzed socioeconomic inequality in the incidence of extreme pre-term birth (EP) and extremely low birth weight (ELBW) among very pre-term/very low birth weight (VP/VLBW) infants. We measured inequality using concentration indices across cohorts and two adjusted measures of horizontal inequity (HI1 and HI2), to estimate the contributions of socioeconomic factors (e.g., parental education, ethnicity) to the outcomes. Results Results showed that the incidence of EP in the Netherlands (HI 2 = 0.171) and Norway (HI 2 = 0.210) was higher among more socioeconomically advantaged infants born at VP/VLBW, but higher among more socioeconomically disadvantaged infants in New Zealand (HI 2 = −0.020). Incidence of ELBW was higher among disadvantaged infants in Germany (HI 2 = −0.046). Parental education was the strongest driver of these effects, though ethnicity and socioeconomic status moderated these effects. Conclusions Counterintuitively, EP/ELBW were concentrated among advantaged groups in some countries, possibly reflecting survival bias or unequal access to neonatal care. The study highlights the need for targeted policies addressing inequities within high-risk pre-term populations and underscores methodological challenges in assessing disparities among vulnerable subgroups.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Global Maternal and Child Health Gestational Diabetes Research and Management Birth Development and Health

Publication details

Journal / source
Frontiers in Public Health
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Volume
14
Pages
1791450–1791450
Publication date
23 April 2026
Language
EN