Investigating the use of generative AI policies among ASPPH member schools and programs of public health

Read full text
Authors: Ashish Joshi, Brian McGoldrick, Nidhi Mittal, Shongkour Roy, Zebunnesa Zeba, Michael Arthur Ofori, Stella Dockery, Niharika Jha, John Auerbach, Jean Cadet, Jessica S. Kruger, Robert Leeman
+19 more Kerry Mitchell, Guillaume Molter, Andrew M. Naidech, Elahe Nezami, Sylvester Olubolu Orimaye, C Queen, Umair Shah, Abdul Shaikh, Daniel Smith, Melissa Tracy, Edward Trapido, Jorg Westermann, Andrew Wiss, Jonathan Zaccarini, Tim Leshan, Linda Alexander, Jamie Atchison, Eduardo Ruiz, Laura Magana
Cited by: 2
References: 26

Abstract

Background: The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) into the operational and curricular foundations of higher education is a dynamically evolving issue, particularly in public health programs looking to ethically embrace the ever-growing potential of AI in health research and education. Despite a collective priority across the United States to effectively adopt generative AI, few works have characterized the scope and rigor of existing guidance. Methods: This study employs a mixed-method design to characterize AI use guidance offered by member schools of the American Schools and Programs of Public Health. Guidance documents are screened for relevance and accessibility, with the remaining documents being classified as guidelines or policies. The determined policies are analyzed for content via descriptive analysis, content analysis, TF-IDF analysis, and thematic analysis. Results: Out of a possible 155 schools, 18 schools were determined to have a generative AI use policy. TF-IDF analysis identified recurring terms of importance throughout the corpus of policy documents. Content and Thematic Analysis identified areas of focus and themes shared throughout the corpus of documents. The resulting triangulated data are used to identify strengths and shortcomings in the extant policies with suggestions for further development. Conclusion: The results of the mixed-method design indicate that extant generative AI guidance in schools and programs of public health in the United States is in its relative infancy. Shared themes and areas of focus show a predominant focus on the intersection of academic integrity and AI use among students and faculty. Additionally, data privacy and security, research ethics, and other areas are currently under consideration. This study demonstrates that AI use governance is growing but narrow in scope. Further development in the areas of pedagogy, legal guidance, and ethical use frameworks are needed in order to meet the growing demand to integrate generative AI into US higher education.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Publication details

Journal / source
Frontiers in Public Health
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Volume
14
Pages
1796810–1796810
Publication date
8 April 2026
Language
EN