Understanding user perceptions of DeepSeek: insights from sentiment, topic and network analysis using a Reddit-based study

Read full text
Authors: Naisarg Patel, Rajesh R. Sharma, Prakash Lingasamy, Vino Sundararajan, Sajitha Lulu Sudhakaran, Vijayachitra Modhukur
Cited by: 1
References: 60

Abstract

Introduction: The launch of DeepSeek, a Chinese open-source generative AI model, generated substantial discussion regarding its capabilities and implications. The r/deepseek subreddit emerged as a key forum for real-time public evaluation. Analyzing this discourse is essential for understanding the sociotechnical perceptions shaping the integration of emerging AI systems. Methods: We analyzed 46,649 posts and comments from r/deepseek (January-May 2025) using a computational framework combining VADER sentiment analysis, Hartmann emotion classification, BERTopic for thematic modeling, hyperlink extraction, and directed network analysis. Data preprocessing included cleaning, normalization, and lemmatization. We also examined correlations between sentiment/emotion scores and dominant topics. Results: Sentiment was predominantly positive (posts: 47.23%; comments: 44.26%), with neutral sentiment comprising ~30% of content. The most frequent emotion was neutrality, followed by surprise and fear, indicating ambivalent user reactions. Prominent topics included open-source AI models, DeepSeek usage, device compatibility, comparisons with ChatGPT, and censorship concerns. Hyperlink analysis indicated strong engagement with GitHub, Hugging Face, and DeepSeek's own services. Network analysis revealed a fragmented but active community, depicting Open-Source AI Models as the most cohesive cluster. Discussion: Community discourse framed DeepSeek as both a technical tool and a geopolitical issue. Enthusiasm centered on its performance, accessibility, and open-source nature, while concerns were voiced about censorship, data privacy, and potential ideological influence. The integrated analysis shows that collective perception emerged through decentralized, dialogic engagement, reflecting broader sociotechnical tensions related to openness, trust, and legitimacy in global AI development.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Scientific Computing and Data Management

Publication details

Journal / source
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Volume
8
Pages
1703949–1703949
Publication date
6 January 2026
Language
EN