Assessment of Carbon Emission Reduction Benefits of Infrastructure Systems in Urban Underground Space Development

Read full text
Authors: Jianping Yang, Qing Liu, Qing Liu, An Shi, Qing Liu, Qing Liu, Na Xu
Cited by: 1
References: 40

Abstract

Urban underground space is increasingly being developed to alleviate surface land constraints and support low-carbon urban development. However, carbon emission reduction (CER) benefits remain inadequately quantified and are not comparable across underground infrastructure types, largely due to the absence of a unified assessment framework, inconsistent system boundaries, and the omission of multi-pathway mitigation mechanisms such as carbon capture and storage and biological sequestration. This study proposes a CER benefit assessment framework for urban underground space that integrates mitigation mechanism identification, pathway analysis, and benefit accounting, explicitly incorporating biological carbon sequestration, carbon substitution, and carbon capture and storage within a unified accounting structure. Accounting models are then established for three representative underground infrastructure systems: transportation, public and commercial services, and municipal utilities. Using Nanjing as a case city to operationalize and validate the proposed assessment framework, we estimate CER across multiple pathways and compare regional differences. The results indicate that underground transportation infrastructure provides the largest benefit (8.74 × 105 tCO2e per year), mainly driven by travel substitution and energy savings in station buildings. Underground public and commercial facilities achieve 6.64 × 105 tCO2e per year, dominated by green-building energy savings and geothermal integration. Municipal utilities contribute a smaller but strategically important reduction, as they provide a long-term carrier for carbon capture and storage and are structurally integrated within underground utility corridors, totaling 0.98 × 105 tCO2e per year citywide. Overall, the findings reveal differentiated mitigation mechanisms and spatial heterogeneity across underground infrastructure systems, providing a theoretical basis for optimizing urban spatial planning and informing low-carbon transition policies.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Underground infrastructure and sustainability Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures Integrated Energy Systems Optimization

Publication details

Journal / source
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
1845–1845
Publication date
12 February 2026
Language
EN