Large Language Models as Explainable AI Ensemble Aggregators for Business Review Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Study with Classical Ensembles

Read full text
Authors: Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis, Dionisis Margaris, Dimitris Spiliotopoulos, Costas Vassilakis
Cited by: 1
References: 56

Abstract

Online business reviews encode rich customer sentiment that is critical for commercial decision making, yet accurately predicting star ratings from free text remains a challenging five-class classification problem. Classical ensemble methods—Soft Voting, Weighted Voting, and Stacking—aggregate complementary base-model outputs to improve predictive performance, but they produce opaque decisions that are unintelligible to business stakeholders. This paper proposes using a large language model (LLM), specifically unsloth/LLaMA-3.3-70B-Instruct, as an Explainable AI (XAI) ensemble aggregator: the LLM receives the predictions and confidence scores of four heterogeneous base models (Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes, and BERT-base-uncased) and reasons over them to produce both a final star-rating prediction and a natural-language explanation. We evaluate the full pipeline on 10,000-sample balanced and natural-distribution test sets derived from the Yelp Academic Dataset, with additional cross-lingual validation on Spanish Amazon Reviews. The LLM aggregator (LLAMA_AGG) achieves the highest macro-F1 on both pipelines (0.6800 on balanced; 0.6720 on natural) and the best ordinal calibration (QWK = 0.9111 on balanced; 0.9337 on natural), outperforming all classical aggregators and base models. A detailed Explainable AI analysis reveals that the LLM revises 28.07% of its standalone predictions after observing the ensemble outputs, improving the accuracy by +22.2 percentage points on the revised cases. The aggregator corrects severe polar bias in the standalone LLM (±0.35 recall improvement on mid-range star classes) and produces longer explanations when evidence is conflicted—a quantitative signal of deliberative reasoning. A formal human evaluation with two judges confirms high explanation faithfulness (4.47/5) and readability (4.82/5). Model scale ablation shows an 8B parameter variant achieves 90.8% agreement with the 70B model, enabling practical deployment. These findings demonstrate that Explainable AI can be achieved through LLM-based ensemble aggregation, establishing a principled approach for business-review sentiment analysis.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Digital Marketing and Social Media

Publication details

Journal / source
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Volume
16
Issue
13
Pages
6479–6479
Publication date
29 June 2026
Language
EN