Self-Perceived Hearing Handicap and Audiometric Severity in Age-Related Hearing Loss: Associations with Age and Sex

Background/Objective: Self-perceived hearing handicap (SPHH) reflects functional consequences of hearing loss beyond audiometric measures. Clarifying its relationship with audiometric severity and demographic factors is important for understanding age-related hearing loss (ARHL). This study examined associations between SPHH, audiometric measures, age, and sex in individuals with ARHL. Methods: A total of 145 adults (50 men, 95 women) aged 60–89 years (mean 71.65 ± 7.19 years) participated. Hearing status was defined using better-ear pure-tone average thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz (BE PTA-4), with ≥20 dB HL as the cutoff and World Health Organization (WHO)-defined severity categories. SPHH was assessed using the Croatian Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly–Screening version (HHIE-S-CRO). HHIE-S-CRO total and subscale scores were examined across BE PTA-4 values and hearing loss categories. Associations were analyzed using correlation and linear regression adjusted for age and sex; group differences were tested using the Kruskal–Wallis test, and ordinal logistic regression assessed monotonic trends across ordered severity categories. Results: HHIE-S-CRO total and subscale scores increased with worsening BE PTA-4 and across hearing loss categories, with substantial overlap. Strong correlations were observed between HHIE-S-CRO scores and audiometric measures. In linear regression, BE PTA-4 was independently associated with HHIE-S-CRO total, emotional, and social/situational scores, whereas age and sex were not. Kruskal–Wallis tests showed significant differences across hearing loss categories. Ordinal logistic regression anchored to WHO severity categories demonstrated graded associations for HHIE-S-CRO total and emotional scores, while the social/situational subscale showed greater dispersion and overlap despite a statistically significant association. Conclusions: SPHH in ARHL shows a strong association with audiometric severity, with particularly robust correspondence for overall and emotional domains, underscoring the complementary role of patient-reported outcome measures alongside audiometric assessment.