Test–Retest Reliability and Validity of a Sums-of-Gaussians-Based Markerless Motion Capture System for Human Lower-Limb Gait Kinematics

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Traditional marker-based optical motion capture systems are costly, time-consuming to operate, and constrained by laboratory environments, limiting their broader adoption in clinical practice and naturalistic settings. Markerless motion capture based on a sums-of-Gaussians (SoG) body model is a potential alternative; however, its metrological properties for kinematic assessment during walking and slow running remain insufficiently validated. Using a conventional marker-based Vicon system as the reference, this study evaluated the reliability and concurrent validity of an SoG-based markerless system (MocapGS) for bilateral lower-limb joint range of motion (ROM) during gait. METHODS: Thirty-six healthy adults completed self-selected-pace speed walking and slow running tasks while both systems synchronously acquired bilateral lower-limb kinematics. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), SEM percentage (SEM%), minimal detectable change (MDC), MDC percentage (MDC%), and root mean square error (RMSE) were used to assess reliability. Concurrent validity was evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient, paired-sample t-tests, and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) to compare the ROM. RESULTS: Vicon showed moderate-to-high reliability for ROM in most joints across both tasks. By contrast, the MocapGS achieved acceptable ICC values mainly for the sagittal-plane ROM at the hip and knee. The CCC analysis showed no significant agreement between the two systems. Bland-Altman plots showed systematic biases with spatially heterogeneous random errors. During walking, MocapGS systematically overestimated ROM relative to Vicon at several joint axes; the widest limits of agreement (LOA) occurred at the left knee X-axis and right hip Z-axis. During running, overestimation was consistent across all bilateral joints at the X-axis and the right hip at the Y-axis, while the widest LOA were found at the bilateral hip X-axes. These specific discrepancies highlighted the joint-axis combinations with the greatest measurement variance. In walking, the test-retest reliability of the knee flexion-extension ROM measured by the MocapGS approached that of Vicon; however, the SEM% and MDC% were generally larger for MocapGS than for Vicon. The RMSE exceeded 5 degrees for ROM in most joint planes, especially in the frontal and transverse planes and at distal joints; errors increased further during slow running. CONCLUSIONS: MocapGS may be used for coarse monitoring of large-magnitude changes in sagittal-plane kinematics during gait; however, it is currently unlikely to replace Vicon for clinical decision-making or detecting subtle gait changes, and its outputs should be interpreted with caution, particularly for ankle kinematics and non-sagittal-plane motion.