Preserving Formative Tendencies in AI Image Generation: Toward Architectural AI Typologies Through Iterative Blending
Abstract
This study explores an alternative design methodology for architectural image generation using generative AI, addressing the challenge of how AI-generated imagery can preserve formative tendencies while enabling creative variation and user agency. Departing from conventional prompt-based approaches, the process utilizes only a minimal initial image set and proceeds by reintroducing solely the synthesized outcomes during the blending and iterative synthesis stages. The central research question asks whether AI can sustain and transform architectural tendencies through iterative synthesis despite limited input data, and how such tendencies might accumulate into consistent typological patterns. The research examines how formative tendencies are preserved and transformed, based on four aesthetic elements: layer, scale, density, and assembly. These four elements reflect diverse architectural ideas in spatial, proportional, volumetric, and tectonic characteristics commonly observed in architectural representations. Observing how these tendencies evolve across iterations allows the study to evaluate how AI negotiates between structural preservation and creative deviation, revealing the generative patterns underlying emerging AI typologies. The study employs SSIM, LPIPS, and CLIP similarity metrics as supplementary indicators to contextualize these tendencies. The results demonstrate that iterative blending enables the deconstruction and recomposition of archetypal formal languages, generating new visual variations while preserving identifiable structural and semantic tendencies. These outputs do not converge into generalized imagery but instead retain identifiable tendencies. Furthermore, the study positions user selection and intervention as a crucial mechanism for mediating between accidental transformation and intentional direction, proposing AI not as a passive generator but as a dialogical tool. Finally, the study conceptualizes such consistent formal languages as “AI Typologies” and presents the potential for a systematic design methodology founded upon them as a complementary alternative to prompt-based workflows.
Fields of Study & Subjects
Architecture and Computational Design
Design Education and Practice
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Publication details
- Journal / source
- Buildings
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 183–183
- Publication date
- 1 January 2026
- Language
- EN