Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA to Assess Tumor Response in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Therapy

Read full text
Authors: Sakti Chakrabarti, S. Marc Cohen, Antony S. Tin, Autumn Dangl, Ki Yong Chung, Mohamedtaki Abdulaziz Tejani, Marwan G. Fakih, Sreenivasa Rao Chandana, Colleen A. Donahue, Virgilio George, Midhun Malla, Vasily N. Aushev
+19 more Giby V. George, J. Bryce Ortiz, Whitney Herter, Arun Nagarajan, Benjamin A. Weinberg, Vivek R. Sharma, Gregory P. Botta, May Cho, Georges Azzi, Anup Kumar Kasi, F. Dayyani, Diana L. Hanna, Bradley G. Somer, Meenakshi Malhotra, Shruti Sharma, Adham Jurdi, Minetta C. Liu, R. Landmann, Arvind Dasari
Cited by: 1
References: 32

Abstract

Background: Circulating tumor (ct)DNA is a prognostic biomarker in gastrointestinal malignancies. In rectal cancer, its utility to inform perioperative management and predict recurrence, particularly in patients undergoing non-operative management (NOM), remains unclear. Studies are needed to clarify how post-neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and post-surgical ctDNA status correlate with clinical outcomes in localized rectal cancer. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed ctDNA data from 220 patients with rectal cancer using a personalized tumor-informed assay (Signatera™, Natera, Inc., Austin, TX, USA). Of these, 148 (67.3%) underwent NAT followed by surgery, and 72 (32.7%) underwent NAT followed by NOM. We assessed associations between post-NAT ctDNA status and survival outcomes. In the surgical cohort, we examined associations between post-operative ctDNA status and clinical response, pathological response, survival outcomes, and NAR scores. Results: In the surgical cohort, ctDNA positivity at the post-operative MRD timepoint was a strong predictor of recurrence, with an 88.3% relapse rate compared to 11.5% in ctDNA-negative patients (p < 0.001). Among the 64 NOM patients with post-NAT ctDNA, 21.9% (14/64) were ctDNA-positive, of whom 100% (14/14) relapsed (92.9% local-only), 13 relapsed by the time of data cut-off, and one relapsed 8 months after the cut-off. Only 10% (5/50) of the ctDNA-negative NOM patients experienced local recurrence (p < 0.0001). ctDNA positivity post-NAT was associated with inferior DFS (p = 0.003). Conclusion: ctDNA was a strong predictor of recurrence in rectal cancer, including in NOM settings. In NOM patients, ctDNA detected local recurrences, highlighting its potential to guide post-NAT surveillance and treatment.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics Cancer Cells and Metastasis Genetic factors in colorectal cancer

Publication details

Journal / source
Cancers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
589–589
Publication date
11 February 2026
Language
EN