Socio-Constructionist Design Thinking: Tools and Practices in Mainstream Education

Read full text
Authors: Alkistis Verevi, Chronis Kynigos, Marios Xenos
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Design Thinking (DT) has been widely promoted as a creative, human-centred approach for engaging students with real-world problems. Yet, research consistently shows that DT in mainstream schooling often struggles with ambiguity, superficial engagement with socio-scientific issues, weak integration of disciplinary knowledge, and epistemological tensions with school learning. In this paper, we examine whether DT can become more effective and educationally meaningful when enacted through a socio-constructionist environment using digital media as both design tools and design products. Drawing on a school-based intervention with 70 students using ChoiCo—an open-source digital authoring system for creating socio-scientific games—we analysed critical incidents of student interaction to explore how constructionist digital media mediate reasoning, collaboration, and conceptual development. Our findings show that ChoiCo supports conceptual clarity, iterative refinement, and epistemic grounding by requiring students to encode ideas into rules, thresholds, and consequences. The system’s malleability and embedded feedback align with a special socio-constructionist DT model developed through a multi-organisational European Research and Innovation Project ExtenDT2, enabling rapid prototyping and collaborative meaning-making. We argue that socio-constructionist DT offers a promising way to address long-standing shortcomings of DT in education, shifting the focus from producing polished artefacts to engaging in meaningful, iterative, and epistemically rich design activity. Implications for curriculum design, teacher practice, and the integration of constructionist digital media in DT pedagogy are discussed.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Design Education and Practice Science Education and Pedagogy Problem and Project Based Learning

Publication details

Journal / source
Education Sciences
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
322–322
Publication date
16 February 2026
Language
EN