Synthetic Data Augmentation for Imbalanced Tabular Data: A Comparative Study of Generation Methods

Class imbalance in tabular datasets poses a challenge for machine learning classification tasks, often leading to biased models that underperform in predicting minority class instances. This study presents a comparative analysis of synthetic data generation methods for addressing class imbalance in tabular data. We evaluate four augmentation approaches—Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE), Gaussian Copula, Tabular Variational Autoencoder (TVAE), and Conditional Tabular Generative Adversarial Network (CTGAN)—using the University of California Irvine (UCI) Bank Marketing dataset, which exhibits a class imbalance ratio of approximately 7.88:1. Our experimental framework assesses each method across three dimensions: statistical fidelity to the original data distribution evaluated through four complementary metrics (marginal numerical similarity, categorical distribution similarity, correlation structure preservation, and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test), machine learning utility measured through classification performance, and minority class detection capability. Results indicate that all augmentation methods achieved statistically significant improvements over the baseline (p