Waste-Derived Fertilizers for Sustainable Soil Management: A Life Cycle and Multi-Indicator Assessment Within an Eco-Environment–Health Framework

Read full text
Authors: Angela Maffia, Federica Alessia Marra, Santo Battaglia, Carmelo Mallamaci, Emilio Attinà, Adele Muscolo
Cited by: 1
References: 55

Abstract

The growing global food demand has increased the use of chemical fertilizers, causing environmental issues. Previous studies have often assessed waste-derived fertilizers separately in terms of soil improvement or environmental impact, with limited integration of these aspects across different recycling processes. This study evaluated the effects on soil quality and the environmental impact of fertilizers produced with different percentages of food wastes and different recycling processes. The fertilizers investigated include vermicompost (VC, 70% wood sawdust + 30% food wastes), Compost 1 (C1, 50% wood sawdust + 50% food wastes), Compost 2 (C2, 10% straw + 90% food wastes), and sulfur–bentonite (SBC, 90% SB + 10% food wastes). Six months post-fertilization, vermicompost significantly improved soil properties, increasing soil organic matter from 3.01% to 4.70% (+56%) and total nitrogen from 0.15% to 0.22%, along with an increase in microbial biomass compared to the unfertilized control. Compost treatments also improved soil quality, although to a lesser extent. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was performed across the entire life cycle of the fertilizers. Vermicompost showed the lowest environmental impact, with a global warming potential of 45 kg CO2 eq ton−1, compared to 93 and 100 kg CO2 eq ton−1 for C1 and C2, respectively, and 167 kg CO2 eq ton−1 for SBC. The results evidenced that vermicompost improved soil quality by increasing soil organic matter, total nitrogen, microbial biomass, and biological activity and that it emitted less CO2 eq, SO2 eq and PO43− during the vermicomposting process, emphasizing its environmental sustainability. The two composts improved soil quality with a moderate environmental impact. SBC positively affected soil properties but with a strong negative environmental impact. From the benefit–cost perspective, the sustainable fertilizer ranking was VC > C2 > C1 > SBC. These findings underscore that these waste management processes represent a possible transition to sustainable fertilizers derived from waste materials to mitigate the environmental degradation associated with the production and use of conventional fertilizers. By adopting these practices, the agricultural sector can boost productivity while maintaining environmental sustainability standards.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Publication details

Journal / source
Environments
Publisher
MDPI AG
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
226–226
Publication date
20 April 2026
Language
EN