Investigation of Sudden Stratospheric Warming (SSW) Events Between 1980 and 2100

The main objective of this work is to characterize Sudden Stratospheric Warming (SSW) conditions and their impact on local weather forecasting and climate change, using SSW definition criteria. The SSWs strongly affect Arctic vortex structure and midlatitude weather conditions. This work evaluates the frequency, amplitude, and dynamical–thermal characteristics of SSWs under historical and Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 scenarios, focusing on stratospheric air temperature (Ts) and zonal wind speed (Uh) at the 10° N and 60° N latitudes. The fifth-generation ECMWF atmospheric reanalysis (ERA5) is employed as the reference dataset. Simulations of five Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models, represented by M1 to M5, are analyzed. The primary group of models included 1) the Australian Community Climate and Earth-System Simulator, version 1.3 (ACCESS1-3, M1), 2) the Hadley Center Global Environmental Model, version 2—Carbon Cycle (HadGEM2-CC, M2), and 3) the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model—Medium Resolution (MPI-ESM-MR, M3). The analysis period covers SSW events related to the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) from 1980 to 2100. The key findings indicate that while M1, M2, and M3 simulate SSW occurrence correctly for the 21st century, they exhibit significant systematic deficiencies in capturing the structural dynamics of SSW events. Specifically, the M1, M2, and M3 models underestimate the polar stratospheric temperature amplitude (Tamp) by approximately 75–80% and zonal wind amplitude (Uamp) by more than 60% compared to the ERA5 analysis. Furthermore, ERA5 exhibits a strong negative correlation (R ≈ −0.8) between Uh and Ts that is not estimated accurately using the present models. The importance of the horizontal resolution of the models and wave–mean flow interactions in determining SSW intensity and occurrence is also found to be a critical metric. Results suggest that SSW definition criteria affect Arctic and midlatitude weather system prediction at a rate of 61–82%. It is concluded that the primary configurations of CMIP5 models for accurately capturing the dynamical structure and evolution of QBO–SSW interactions are needed, and that they affect future projections of SSW events.