Spatiotemporal Variability in the C-Factor: Validation and Comparative Evaluation of NDVI and RUSLE2 C-Factor Estimation Approaches

NDVI-based approaches offer an efficient method for estimating the C-factor, providing continuous spatial coverage and enabling monitoring of short-term changes in vegetation and management practices. This study aims to evaluate the performance of nine well-established NDVI-based C-factor models compared to RUSLE2 model estimates across a specific crop type, different tillage methods, and multiple time scales (monthly, seasonal, and yearly). While some NDVI models showed promising agreement with RUSLE2 estimates, this alignment was not sufficient to ensure accurate C-factor representation in the Gully Creek watershed. The results show that NDVI-based model performance varies systematically with crop type, tillage practice, and temporal scale. Monthly estimates generally reflect broader seasonal patterns, indicating that finer temporal resolution captures intra-seasonal variability without altering overall trends. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for spatial and temporal heterogeneity in C-factor estimation, as model effectiveness depends on local crop composition, management intensity, and temporal resolution rather than a single universally applicable approach.