Sequential Helical–Axial–Helical Triple-Rule-Out CT Angiography: Technical Feasibility and Territory-Specific Image Quality in the Emergency Department

Read full text
Authors: Yong Wook Kim, Gi-Yong An, Sung-Jin Cha, Sung Min Ko
Cited by: 1
References: 25

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Triple-rule-out CT angiography (TRO-CTA) enables simultaneous evaluation of coronary, pulmonary, and aortic causes of acute chest pain, but conventional single-acquisition protocols may compromise vascular enhancement because of conflicting contrast timing requirements. This study evaluated whether a physiology-based sequential helical–axial–helical acquisition strategy could provide consistent tri-territory enhancement in emergency settings. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, 71 consecutive evaluable emergency department patients (mean age, 66.6 ± 17.0 years; 33 women) with undifferentiated acute chest pain underwent TRO-CTA using a structured sequential protocol (pulmonary, coronary, and aortic phases) guided by individualized test-bolus timing. Objective image quality was assessed using vascular attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR); subjective image quality was independently graded by two radiologists. Results: Mean vascular attenuation exceeded predefined diagnostic thresholds in all territories (pulmonary 546.7 ± 237.8 HU [95% CI, 490.4–603.0]; coronary 438.8 ± 113.9 HU [95% CI, 411.9–465.8]; aortic 604.3 ± 190.9 HU [95% CI, 559.2–649.5]). Diagnostic interpretability was achieved in all three territories in every technically analyzable examination without repeat contrast-enhanced imaging. Median subjective image-quality scores were 5 (IQR, 4–5) for pulmonary, 4.5 (IQR, 4–5) for coronary, and 4 (IQR, 4–5) for aortic phases; interobserver agreement was good to excellent. Mean total DLP was 461.5 ± 122.5 mGy·cm. Conclusions: A sequential physiology-based TRO-CTA strategy is technically feasible in a tertiary emergency setting and provides consistent tri-territory enhancement. Because this was a single-arm technical validation study, prospective comparative and outcome-based studies are required to confirm its clinical impact.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics Radiation Dose and Imaging Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
4640–4640
Publication date
15 June 2026
Language
EN